requestId:684c3e4f9becf5.23176477.
About the internal danger and practical direction of “divergence of virtue and blessing”
——Reflection and analysis of Mou Zongsan’s related remarks
Author: Blue Code (Associate Professor of Shandong Teacher Fan Dao Institute of Civilization)
Source: “Humanities and Difficulties”, 2021 Issue 4
Abstract: Mou Zongsan’s most basic goal is not to explain the ability of “divergence of virtue and blessing”, but to use this problem to reflect the infiniteness of Kantian morality, which proves that the infinity of “infinite wisdom” and “six-alone objects” is “divergence”, which in turn makes the value of Confucian confidant and the value of the body of matter, and the value of the body of matter can be achieved by infinite confirmation, and finally becomes the responsibility of the Confucian “new foreign king” fantasy. Therefore, the logic of “verbal meaning” used by Mr. Mou to solve the problem of “divorce and blessing” is a kind-hearted expression, but its quality is only to emphasize the interesting meaning of Confucian ethics and that it can give more sufficient emotional explanations to the external king’s desires. In this process, the “activity characteristics” of confidant “both existing and active” solves the danger that morality is eliminated in the logic of “verbal meaning”, and ultimately points the reality of the “divergence of virtue and blessing” problem to the social fantasy that will be implemented as the “new foreign king” will definitely improve and create the social fantasy of others.
Keywords:Differences between virtue and blessing; Mou Zongsan; the meaning of judging; good at judging; the outside king
Adding the teachings of Huajian and Lutai Sect, and using Confucianism to solve the problem of “differences between virtue and blessing” in Kant’s philosophy is a trial of Mou Zongsan’s understanding of Chinese and Western philosophy. He is in “The Discussion of the World”Baozhuang The basic idea of the description itself is, “Based on Confucianism, Confucianism must be the king’s teaching to be the king’s teaching to be a close friend. It developed to Wang Longxi’s ‘four no’, and then it was recalled from the ‘one book’ of Mingdao and Hu Wufeng’s ‘heaven and human desires’, and it was officially revealed. From this, the sacred teachings can formally answer the ability of goodness, which is different from Kant’s answer. “1 This explanation comes from the two-level arguments constructed by Teacher Mou, who communicated with Chinese and Western cultures, and these two-level arguments come from the separation between Kant’s philosophical phenomena and objects themselves with the “intuition of wisdom”.
However, there are many doubts about Mr. Mou’s thoughts on solving the “differences between virtue and blessing” through “immediate meaning”. For example, Yang Zebo believed that “Mu Zong tried his best to sort out the two concepts of “reality and morality” and hoped to solve the problem of good deeds in this way, but all you can achieve through these two parts is virtue.Happiness, not material happiness”, 2 points out that Teacher Mou’s “divergence of virtue and blessing” and Kant’s “divergence of virtue and blessing” are two different things. Using the “verbal meaning of judging” method does not fail to realize the happiness of the natural world in Kant’s meaning. In this view, Yang Hu pointed out that this dichotomy of “material” and “energy” has the ability to misunderstand, because Kant’s natural domain is not equal to the material domain, and Teacher Mou’s good deeds importantly refer to the blessing revealed by the creation of benevolence. 3 The dichotomy of “material” and “energy” is completed Whether it is suitable for Mr. Mou’s good discussion is not the same. The problem is that Mr. Mou’s method has never solved the problem of “divergence of virtue and blessing” based on Kant’s meaning. If Yang Zuhan denied this kind of trial, he believed that “Mr. Mou’s words are of course right and wrong. Often energetic, but as mentioned above, happiness is not just a matter of rationality, but it is always about reason. Since it is about reason, it cannot be included in the realm of infinite meaning of saints and Buddhas… Therefore, we are the leader, although the differences in virtue and blessings (the highest good or the most good) are Short-term maintenanceThe necessary object of emotion is to be realized, that is, the fantasy must be realized, but this must be actually said on the level of religious worship.” 4 It is not only Mr. Mou who teaches the problem of “divergence of virtue and blessing” There are disputes in the solution, and whether this solution can cause great problems has also aroused the concerns of the academic community. For example, Jing Haifeng wrote an article pointing out that the biggest disadvantage of Teacher Mou’s solution lies in the disconnection of sentimentalism, and this shortcoming will lead to “the more refined the system structure, the more it can be far away from reality. ”.5
If you want to distinguish the above questions, you must first clarify the “disagreement and blessing” method of Teacher Mou, that is, the “verbal meaning of “things are inherent” and “infinite wisdom and mind” that is, the “verbal meaning is to be seen as “that is,” which is forced by the “infinite wisdom and mind” difference. ” is a way of “both right and wrong”. Staying in “non” will make “benefits and blessings” have no differences; staying in “yes”, the “verbal is the right” method will inevitably cause the danger of “ethical dissolution”; because “verbal is the right” can be used to describe the good state of morality, morality is not independent href=”https://blog-tw.net/Sugar/”>investigation software is rooted in the “imitation of sanity”. For this crisis, Mr. Mou used the characteristics of “confidant” and “both existing and active”. However, even if we admit that “differences between virtue and blessing” can be obtained by the method of Mr. Mou, this explanation is not Kant’s meaning. Because The word happiness falls into its own independent meaning in “the implication of verbalization” and can only be attached to the supreme virtue of morality. In other words, the goal of Mr. Mou’s teaching certificate is not to whether “benevolence” can be “diverged”, but to use this to verify the political management idea of ”new foreign king” and make the fantasy of “the inner sage opens a new foreign king” seek to establish the goal of “decision” that must be “diverged”.of.
1. The emotional decision from Kant’s “benefit and blessing” to “benefit”
The question of whether “benefit and blessing” can be different in Kant’s philosophy is the question of “how can the ultimate good be sufficient in reality”6, that is, being supreme and complete good means not only virtue, but also happiness. If the two are inconsistent, then in fact, unfortunately, it raises an unavoidable challenge to morality—博官网—Who is willing to end up in a unfortunate life in the process of seeking morality? Therefore, in the face of the differences between virtue and blessing in the world of experience, Kant emphasized that this is a conditional error, and That is, happiness cannot be achieved as a certain result of seeking virtue under the condition of sensory experience the world. In order to seek a perfect and perfect reality, we must acknowledge the certain existence of the two realms of “spiritual immortality” and “God’s existence” so that virtue and blessing have a different ability.
Kant believes that the reason for this is that, first, “the complete fit between will and morality is divineness, which is a certain perfection that the sensual being in the sensory world cannot achieve at any moment of its existence.” “So it is only in a process towards infinite ”, “This infinite process can only be achieved under the condition of a certain infinity of the continuation of the infinity of the preservation and personality of a sensual being (we call it the immortality of the soul). ”6
Secondly, if the reality of happiness depends on the condition of natural offering, then the happiness that is assigned according to virtue is Cultivation There must be a natural first cause that nature is created and included. This is to say that “the supreme cause of nature, as long as it must be predesigned as the supreme good, is an existence that becomes the natural cause (and therefore the natural creator) through intellect and will, that is, God. Therefore, the energy-based design of the highest derived good (the best world) is also the real design of the good of some highest source, that is, the realization of God’s existence.” 6
But this solution, Kant himself also admitted t
發佈留言